Freon or Relentless (whichever you prefer),
I responded to your idea previously after having carefully read your referred to post. I now, once again, after having reread the same post have reached the same conclusion as before. NO MORE THREADS!!! Perhaps you believe you are being clever, but I think you have exposed yourself not only on this thread on SI (of which you are a "Trial Member"), but also on the "Raging Bull" thread. Your posts have added no DD. All you have done is post innuendos with no facts. Now you ask the paid members of this thread to agree that we should have a new thread where "bashers" such as yourself pretending to be longs can post without the ability to have your garbage corrected by people doing their DD for the education of those interested in TSIG. Please remember my old expression... if you can't dazzle them with brilliance, baffle them with B.S.!! Your posts have been so infantile and lacking in any substance that too many of us have questioned your motivation for quite a while. What poisontaster posted was true DD. What you are now "suggesting" is just another clandestine method of getting the "bashers" (most of whom, IMHO, I suspect are professionals) posted... only this time without even the opportunity to expose their antics with a response. Do you really think the members of this thread are stupid? I'm sorry, young man (you are a male I presume), but I don't think so and neither do my attorneys who are investigating filing papers with the SEC for violation of the new internet stock manipulation rules. I am sure you are aware that under Federal subpoena, the true identities of any thread member can be ascertained. Some "bashers" are just plain simple and others are very smooth and are quite articulate with excellent verbal skills, but your agendas are the same. I am long TSIG because I've done my DD and continue to do so. If something new is pointed out to me... positive or negative, I listen and investigate and make my own decision. If I am wrong, I will and have apologized. If you choose to call me a "hyper" that is certainly your prerogative, but I have repeated over and over again that you and any of the other "bashers" or even potential new investors who have concerns should call TSIG directly if the answers they receive on the thread do not answer their questions to their satisfaction. Certainly their information is more credible than a "basher" who posts unsupported negatives or hypotheticals taken out of context over and over again, but refuses to call the company directly. And please call with at least two verifiable third party witnesses and record the conversation so there can be no debate as to what was said. Then your posts and that of certain others may have some credibility. Until then, however, I humbly suggest you watch yourself and your actions carefully. Big brother is now watching. That is not a threat... only the facts. I and most of the other "old timers" from the original thread are frankly tired of the games you and your cronies are playing and it's time to put a stop to it. It's quite strange that the majority of "bashers" own not one share of TSIG and yet have expended so much time on this thread. Why?? Attorneys who specialize in SEC work make a pretty penny just trying to interpret Edgar filings and yet you and certain others make it seem so simple. Your days of trying to baffle with B.S. because you can't dazzle with brilliance are coming to an end. If you want to play hardball, than let's let the "legal eagles" do their job and let the chips fall where they may.
Good luck in your future... where ever it takes you and your friends,
Marty |
