Burrows, pot calling the kettle black!
You said -<A COMPLETE LIE!!! This was a patent infringement lawsuit from START TO FINISH!
WHEN the jury reached the decision that GE HAD infringed on Fonar's patents for Cancer
detection and MAO, they THEN determined damages, damages based in part on what
Fonar's sales WOULD have been had GE not stolen this intellectual property>
THIS WAS A CIVIL CASE, not a PATENT case in PATENT COURT.
Spin shooter is asking which claims were infringed on. If this was a PATENT CASE (it's not), it is a matter of public record which claims were infringed on.
You should be prepared to back up your serious claim that someone is lying with a citation to the patent court case number. Since you are incorrect, you can not. It was a CIVIL case. I am warning you, this is not Yahoo! Your rude accusations against another poster (trial or permanent) could get your SI priveleges bounced, let alone your own submission of incorrect information.
But, I notice this is your FIRST and ONLY post on SI, so your claims are not only baseless, but your motivation is suspicious as well. Some new members are working towards those 10 excellent posts that will win them a free SI membership, and some new members are just not worth the bandwidth.
Patti- it's a real stretch to say Fonar has the first MRI patent. A real stretch. As we are trying to be informed investors, let's not dwell on marketing hyperbole. It's of no material consequence if Fonar had the first or 117th patent-- what matters is that they may have gotten a big chunk of green that they can use to grow the company. How much, when, and for what- these are the big issues!
Spin Shooter- Hi! I'll send you a private message. I WAS one of the guys in the UW "temporary" building (temporary for 40 years and going strong!) Good posts!
Can anyone tell me when the next earnings are released?
WebDrone |
