Fonar - Where is it going? Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Fonar - Where is it going?

FONR 14.71

-1.0%

Nov 5 3:57 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: daveG who wrote (10694)	8/5/1998 12:40:00 PM
From: James L. Fleckenstein	Read Replies (1) of 19354

Dave, no I did not say it was cheaper to run an OPART. What I am saying is that Fonar cannot argue that it is cheaper to run a Fonar than an OPART on the basis of 'supercons are more expensive to operate than resistives' arguement because it is not true when cryogens do not need to be replaced. Cryogens are the main cost of operations and since neither the OPART nor FONAR need to replace cryogens, the argument won't work there. Also, to follow-up on what you heard about GE's pricing, I can tell you because I have seen the responses to our RFPs that GE magnets are essentially the most expensive MRIs available.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next