Mudweasel:
Me thinketh thou protesteth too much.
I enjoy a good intellectual argument every now and then, but some of your fellow shorts obviously have other intentions. I am sure many of you are professional traders. From the view of the common man, your collective rants appear to be focused on driving the price down, not simply debating the merits of the stock. From a review of these posts over the last couple of months, the most vapid comments have come from the short side, not the long. (GMAB Goldfinger, you seem to be the one running the scam. What record? For all we know, you have no investment here one way or the other).
Where is the evidence of your assertion that the runup was unfounded? I have none that it was for real, but then I am not claiming. I do happen to think that management knows what they are doing here, and am certainly willing to see what unfolds. Any of you shorts at the annual meeting last week? I was. Maybe you don't need the facts in order to promote your campaign of FUD. I heard Tim Peters answer the questions put to him without evasion. I spoke with others members of management. I noted the interest on the part of other shareholders. I think these guys are on to something and I don't see evidence here that anyone (you too, Techguy) understands what they are trying to do.
I like the emerging industry and I think the company has savvy management. I'm used to investing on a hunch. The runup into the 30's did not surprise me. In the mean time, I will have fun debunking the witty repartee of you shorts, who failing to be able to grasp the essence of this opportunity, seem only able to regurgitate each other's insipid comments.
ROR...
NJR |
