SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Shorting stocks: Mechanical aspects

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Q. who wrote (92)8/6/1998 12:46:00 AM
From: Banjoman   of 172
 
>>Don, I'm curious how your mechanical short picks (VL/Zacks 5) fared compared to the market indexes in today's mini crash. <<

None of the portfolios I'm tracking lost as much as the S&P lost (on a % basis). Several of the portfolios were affected by the hostile buyout offer for AMP (unfortunately including my real money portfolio - darn good thing I'm well diversified, since I got "banjoed" twice in a week!).

Here's the data:
stocks picked 4/27 - 18 stocks, VL5xZ5, fell 2.9% on Tuesday
stocks picked 6/10,6/29,7/13 (real) - *gained* 1.0% on Tuesday
gain was due to AMP, if AMP is excluded, the rest lost 1.4%
stocks picked 8/3 - *gained* 1.0% due to AMP, otherwise lost 1.3%

I think the type of stocks picked by this strategy tend to have low betas - so I'm not surprised they didn't fall as far as the market on Tuesday.

Another portfolio I'm tracking, the 20 lowest RS stocks ranked #5 by Zacks, did fall farther than the market on Tuesday, down 4.5%. However, this portfolio has been much more volatile - and up to the last week was not doing as well as the VL based portfolios.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext