Jeff, nice work. Better than a cum laude law student.
JAB, what you have posted is a significant writing. Certainly more than a quick note dashed off between appointments.
What I continue to miss is a motive. What's your motive for putting so much effort into these, and you have done these writings often, but just what is your motive if you are a disinterested party?
Or could it be that you are not a disinterested party? I, and I believe many of us would possibly give your writings, really negative assumptions, because that's all they really are, but if we knew your motives for doing such writings, possibly we could make a better judgement about your negative assumptions.
After all, if you were an attorney for the SEC, that would possibly give great weight to your negative assumptions about Mr. Gordon's actions.
Let's see... if Mr. Gordon is the kind of person you have indicated, maybe he has hired you so that he could acquire more cheap shares. Really Mr. Berry, until we have your credentials, your negative assumptions about Mr. Gordon's actions carry little weight around here.
On the other hand if you were an ex-employee of TSIG, we would make another judgement about your negative assumptions about Mr. Gordon's actions.
Furthermore, if you were an research attorney hired by a competitor, which you may or may not be, but if you are an attorney, and were hired by a competitor, we would make yet another judgement about your negative assumptions of Mr. Gordon's actions.
You see Mr. Berry, no one here on the thread will believe me if I tell them the share price will be at $4 by the end of August because they know where... well, they know where I'm coming from so-to-speak.
By the way I do believe the share price has an excellent chance of being at $4 by the end of the month, but what do I know? I do know that if the share price gets over $2 Rob Gordon will have an outstanding corporate currency with which to negotiate acquisitions. A competitor would do well to do everything in its power to keep the TSIG share price low. At least for awhile so as to get it's own marketing plan further along.
After all not one company of any repute, currently in the Internet CD business is making a profit. And you know what, none are projecting a profit for the foreseeable future. And do you know why? Because they have to spend enormous percentages of their gross just to get the word out. TSIG will not have that burden. Worse for them, TSIG will be able to turn a large profit by selling for less money than all of these high profile companies. They will have to lower their selling price to compete. That will put significantly greater strain on already bleak projections. And as they lose more market share only one or two Internet CD retailers will be left standing. Could it be that someone is really afraid of TSIG's potential to dominate this market?
Mr. Berry, you really need to cough up your real motives for anyone here to spend any more time reading your work; and we all know it's work... now don't we?
Rich |
