Rocky Mountain Intl (OTC-RMIL) Short-Squeeze History Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Rocky Mountain Intl (OTC-RMIL) Short-Squeeze History

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Ellen who wrote (25)	8/6/1998 8:27:00 AM
From: tonto	Read Replies (1) of 49

Ellen, this is the post I commented on, please note no mention of Palco. I understand how you could presume to believe the Palco negotiations were dropped for the party line reasons, but a call to Pat may provide you with additional direct insight. To: +tonto (50729 ) From: +Ellen Wednesday, Aug 5 1998 5:06AM ET Reply # of 50938 >> Now the Wall Street Journal and Bloomberg are also dupes? I think not Dave. They have a very solid grasp of what goes on here and they have excellent reputations. << A very solid grasp of what goes on here...? If you are referring to SI in general...maybe. If you are referring to this particular stock...I seriously doubt it. It seems highly unlikely that they have read all the messages on all the related threads and really have that solid a grasp on what goes on here. And I'm so sick of people using the word "hype" disparagingly when more than likely what people like you are referring to is better classified as "cheerleading" their stock or merely saying positive things about their stock. I'm so tired of those who expect shareholders of any stock not to say anything good about it. That's a stupid stance. Hype is bogus information or extremely exaggerated information, cheerleading is entirely a different thing. Hype is talking about after having done dd, how the stock has x value based on fundamentals, when there were no fundamentals. That in no way is cheerleading. In many circles it is considered lying and investors get hurt. The SEC halted trading because of violations which had nothing to do with Palco. Fortunately for Pat, his life dream was not lost, he is not tied to RMIL and continues in operation. As Roland said in the Wall Street Journal, the company has no money, this would have been terrible for Palco. How would the deal have been good for Palco, knowing what we know now?

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next