Nokia (NOK) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Nokia (NOK)

NOK 5.880

-2.6%

3:59 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: tero kuittinen who wrote (836)	8/6/1998 11:22:00 AM
From: marginmike	Read Replies (2) of 34857

Then where are the patents from 7 years ago? Why would Erickson deny CDMA's attributes. If Nokia had CDMA 7 years ago, why did they buy a liscence? Im sorry, You are defending thieves and liers. It removes any credibility you would have. I am a Nokia shareholder also, and dont feel Qcom and Nokia's success cant be mutual.The bottom line is W-CDMA is a joke. It is CDMA with standards changed to differentiate it. In the end Erickson may win, but you cant prostitute the truth! Qualcom developed CDMA against all types of pressure, and lies, and noise, by people much like yourself. The fact is now the piper must be paid. The Europeans will not be allowed to make up the rules as they did with GSM. The question you might ask yourself is who has more downside risk? Qualcoms stock price has been discounted for all this noise, and short positions, ang European analysts downgrades. However Nokia and Erickson do not have downside in their stock. What if Q beets Erickson in court? What happens if Q's CDMA is victorious and Erickson and Nokia have to play catch up? That is not priced into Nokia's lofty stock price.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next