Webdrone,
That is a funny retort.
Speaking of recent quotes:
"Spin shooter is asking which claims were infringed on. If this was a PATENT CASE (it's not), it is a matter of public record which claims were infringed on....you should be prepared to back up your serious claim that someone is lying with a citation to the patent court case number. Since you are incorrect, you can not...."
As you believe that one's "submission of incorrect information" might eventually "get your SI priveleges bounced", perhaps you might help me understand something:
After visiting the US Patent Site (See some of my earlier posts), Summary Databases on Patent Decisions, and an online transcript of the Circuit Court decision of FONR Vs GE, I see:
1. No special "Patent Court" other than normal "procedure of the Federal courts"
2. Clear reference to GE infringement of two Fonar patents, *
3. Identification of the two patents that were infringed.
U.S. Patent 4,871,966 and U.S.Patent 3,789,832.
4. All easily to be found in the public record.
So how did you come to such curious beliefs?
Michael
* including what seems to be the earliest known patent regarding the use of NMR imaging, which in the opinion of the court "concerns a technique for using NMR imaging to detect cancer. MRI machines rely upon the principles of NMR to produce cross-sectional images of body tissue." |
