SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : VLSI Technology - Waiting for good news from NASDAQ !!!

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: ricky who wrote (4085)8/7/1998 8:26:00 PM
From: GS_Wall Street  Read Replies (1) of 6565
 
As I stated along time ago, I have used product from most semiconductor suppliers, Mainly Motorola, but on a limited basis, IBM, VLSI, LSI, Symbios, etc, etc.

The reasons for selecting each supplier was different. The main reason per and simple was IP. When I did not have it in house, I found it elsewhere VLSI and LSI. When I developed the product in house I used Motorola or IBM as sutto Founderies, meaning they participated in the design ie layout and simulations.

So I this point I do not see IBM or Motorola as direct competitors to VLSI or LSI they each provide different advantages.

The Semiconductor market is large enough for more than one supplier to excell. Even small niche companies can be competitive Broadcom for example has IP in it QAM core which is hot right now for cable modems and digital set top boxes. You combine Broadcomm frontend with VLSI's Vista product and you could own the market. IBM would be 2-3 three years behind in terms of IP.

Good Luck to All.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext