I've been reading up on this thread, and would suggest everyone read notes 2 through 65 if they want to understand the mentality of the company.
Ryan presented himself specifically as a customer of Web Street, referring to Web Street as "they." He denied an affiliation. He lied in each of his posts.
When he was found out, he said he didn't mean to mislead, is an honest person, but he did mean to mislead. He could have spoken as an employee saying what he liked about the company, but chose to lie, to be more effective in touting. How many of us at any age would engage in blatant deception to tout our companies, rather than proudly admit our affiliation to tout our companies? I consider this a serious breach of ethics.
When Joe Fox responded here, in note 65, he also said that Ryan didn't intend to mislead. Oops! Ryan posted repeated outright lies. Read his posts.
Joe Fox also said all email to him would be answered. Ooops! Mine was not.
Joe Fox described Ryan as a night broker. Ooops! He promoted him after his behavior here, to be the head of the margin department? The fact that Ryan engaged in duplicity here, deception, and dishonesty was somehow a recommendation that he be put in charge of margin?
Egads. I will never open another account without reading the threads first.
When I spoke to Ryan about the overbuy I made, the one that cost me $100, and Ryan promised me that commmission credit, he also used the same phrase he used here. He told me in a sincere tone that he's a very honest person. Of course, no credit was provided, and he later lied about having promised it.
That, and the other reports I see in this thread, confirm my poor experiences with Web Street. Many others have reported the same problems. I am reviewing the thread before I post elsewhere about Web Street.
Interesting that I was the one singled out to be personally attacked on line by Jon Rosenberg, while so many others have posted the same "defamations" right here. I wonder why that is...
Linda |