SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Nokia (NOK)
NOK 6.035-9.1%Nov 19 3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: marginmike who wrote (847)8/9/1998 11:55:00 AM
From: Raymond  Read Replies (1) of 34857
 
Marginmike!
I think you need to read a little bit about the story of the digital
standards.I quote "GSM was setup with different properties to make
it incompatible with US GSM and TDMA".First of all GSM is an
older standard then US TDMA.US TDMA and IS-95 CDMA has
taken after a lot of features that was pioneered in GSM.For example
SMS (short message service).US GSM was introduced 1995 and is more or less the same as European GSM .The difference is only
the frequency band.Another thing you are raging about is that
Europe is so protected because they have choosen one standard for mobile telephony.ETSI where the standards are set
is not controlled by the governments.The ones that have votes are
manufacturers,operators and organizations that are active in Europe
including all the big american telecom companies.If choosing one standard is wrong then I think we shall outlaw the internet protocols,
SS7 signalling(Signalling between public switches) and all the rest of the telecom standards that makes it possible to make calls to and from other countrys and within.It's a typical US stance to say if the rest of the world is not adopting our standards and if we don't dominate all high tech industries then they are protectionistic.
You mentioned cars as an example how Europe is protecting it's
industries mentioning Citroen as an example.France is not Europe!!!
Why didn't you mention Finland and Sweden.Thats the countries
where Nokia and Ericsson is coming from.Sweden for example has
2 different carmakers.Volvo and Saab and for a country of 8 million
thats of course a really important industri.But there are no protection at all.foreign brands including the japanese car makers are totally
dominant.US on the other hand that are not so dependent of
the carindustrie have import quotas for japanese cars(Or do they
call it voluntary reduction of export from Japan) .Thats in the situation where foreign cars just take a fraction of the market.It's another typical american view not knowing anything about Europe.Taking the worst countries in every category and comparing this countries with US.
I think US under Clinton has gone from one of the most open
countries in international trade to becoming more and more
protectionistic.Kodak is a prime example.They don't have the same
marketshare in Japan as in US.See thats proof how closed Japan is
for American goods.I am just waiting to see what QCOM can get
the administration to do for them.The only problem could be that
Ericsson and Nokia is employing more Americans then QCOM.
/R
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext