Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM)

QCOM 165.07

-1.0%

Nov 18 3:59 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Raymond who wrote (13496)	8/9/1998 3:16:00 PM
From: Gregg Powers	Read Replies (3) of 152472

Raymond: (A) you clearly do not understand the patents in question for the Richardson litigation. The best ERICY could hope for out of its lawsuit with QC is mitigation of some of the royalties it would owe to Qualcomm. ERICY cannot, as you suggest, "close down the shop". There is a large difference between "hypothesizing" about possibilities and understanding potential outcomes. (B) you presume that I have simply relied on whatever QC management has told me with regard to the IPR situation. This is not the case as we have paid for several, rather expensive and very detailed, reviews of the relevant patent portfolios by independent legal counsel(s). Best regards, Gregg

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next