Dream Machine ( Build your own PC ) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Dream Machine ( Build your own PC )

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Dirk Hente who wrote (1855)	8/9/1998 3:28:00 PM
From: halfscot	Read Replies (1) of 14778

Dirk: Thanks for your post-very helpful. I was considering purchasing the PII 300 but after reading subsequent postings here on this thread I'm thinking the Celeron would be a better choice. What I've read so far about overclocking the Celeron has been w/the 266 to 400 MHz but what about the Celeron 300 or the newer 300 w/128 L2 cache? I would think the same logic would apply but you could get even much faster speeds w/the newer L2 cache. Would you care to guess what stable speeds would be likely w/either the 300 or 300 w/L2? I just purchased the new Abit BH6 which has even more choices for overclockers in both voltages and FSB. TIA halfscot

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next