Dusty,
"Now, I see that is not acceptable to you. Why?"
No No No!! Not True!
I agree 100% that caution is in order. I don't disagree with the fact that everything and everyone should be questioned. However, the very first post Joe made was of a critical nature, and I do not think that is fair either.
I agree that the negatives should be posted right along with the positives, which is why I am trying to find a way to share this 20 plus page audited financial I have. I want someone else to see this, just in case there IS something bad that I have missed.
I too, plan to leave no stone unturned. I would rather err on this side of caution. I will not be critical of a naysayer, however, I will still be critical of meritless personal attacks on individuals. Questions are one thing...accusations of wrongdoing and innuendo are quite another, and will be met with my wrath whenever I see them.
To be honest with you, however, I have quite enjoyed the intelligent dialogue we have been able to have over the past few posts.
:-)
Binder |
