Hi Saul...I have a question in regards to your post,
"...in light of the recent drilling results that have been released just this last week."
I'm uncertain what you mean by this line, does it mean that the results that were released are poor, inadequate, short of expectations, not enough holes, wrong area, etc...I ask this because I'd like to get your take on it. Frankly, I'm in Bob Tate's camp, Kinross/MIQ are going about this methodologically, they need to prove up continuity, in addition to good results, etc. These results are from the EHR area, and both Bunker Hill and POD are by far their best zones and should prove up the best results. The results are also in line with previous releases from the EHR area, nothing extraordinary with these numbers, but they are good regardless. I've also run this by a number of mining people and geologists I know and trust personally and they come to the same conclusion as Bob Tate on the plan here. The only thing I want to know is why was the EHR zone first?
Thanks...
Brandon |
