Thanks Matthew,
wineinvestmentnews.com
When Perdue says scrambling, I like the sounds of it. Close Danielle, bring me in to help with the transition, :) , grow the business, accelerate the debt payoff, have $10MM+ revenue, make some profit, get busy in the wine business, make some strategic acquisitions, and before you know it the price of the stock will start to move.
I'm not saying this to challenge our negative friends to post the negative side of things. Just for them Danielle is far from a done deal, $700,000 is a lot of money, management hasn't proven it can grow the cheese business, some previously announced deals have fallen through, wine is only available for sale in NY, and if anyone says anything good about Araldica they are promoters or hipsters.
On the other hand, Araldica has some wealthy shareholders who believe in the company and want it to succeed. Danielle is an investment that can pay for itself and more. Local management of Danielle instead of absentee ownership can tend to increase revenue, the wine attorneys will guide the expansion of the wine business in the proper course of Araldica's growth and those who like this company and say positive things are good people who have a right to a fair chance to succeed.
Slim |
