SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM)
QCOM 159.59-3.9%Nov 20 3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Sawtooth who wrote (13525)8/10/1998 12:38:00 PM
From: JMD  Read Replies (2) of 152472
 
Tim, all. With apologies in advance for not providing you folks with a link that will take you directly to the article [don't know how], there are 2 reasons to head your browser here:
sfgate.com
Go to Section E (Business), page E3. There are two write-ups, the first "Area Startup Wins Deals With Nokia, Ericsson", which reprints John Markoff's article on GPS, and Sirf Technology, Inc. [both these references are for today's edition, 8/10]
The second article is immediately above the first: "Qualcomm/Stock of the Week", which is a regular feature with an 'Upside'/'Downside' profile.
In summary, Pete Peterson of Volpe Brown Whelan & Co. (San Francisco) gives the upside. His rating is "Buy". Marc Cabi of Credit Suisse/ First Boston (San Francisco) takes the flip side. His rating is "Hold", but appended to that is the last sentence of his write-up: "We think that [earnings recovery next year] will be difficult and that the stock will under-perform and go down from here".
I have previously posted that a local household name firm in SF has a strong distaste for the Mighty Q; that cat is now out of the bag. I have NEVER in several years of following the Upside/Downside feature seen an analyst state that he thinks "the stock will go down from here". Clearly, I have seen analysts rip a stock and one could read between the lines and come to that conclusion, but this explicitly? Not once.
Cabi's write-up is extremely negative in the body of his report as you might imagine. Got my week off to a crappy start. Comments? Mike Doyle
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext