Hi Stocks, I can't speak for Saul, but in my opinion there is just not enough information released about the drill program to be able to make an informed opinion about the assayed numbers that have been released so far. There are quite a few juniors that provide considerably more information about their drill program than MIQ.
Try for example CUMBERLAND RESOURCES - T.CBD (they have an SI thread, check out their news releases and their web site through the Carlson profile - the electronic news releases might not include the maps, etc. that are included in the paper versions). CBD routinely provides maps, drill spacing, angle of drilling direction, profiles and cross-sections, etc. I think that this is the standard that all juniors should be working towards.
Unless the shareholders put some pressure on MIQ now, we will never get the level of information we want simply because the company will say to themselves: "We only have to show shareholders minimal information to satisfy the regulators - our shareholders seem to be satisfied with that." What Ray and Saul and I are saying is that we are not satisfied with the amount and/or quality of the information released by MIQ to date.
By the way, I see that Kinross has today re-issued the MIQ news release, verbatim, 4 days after MIQ. Too bad - Kinross could have showed us what a good news release should look like, and MIQ could have learned a thing or two....another lost opportunity to teach JS how to run a mining company!
Regards.
grant. |
