You have a dilemna in your case. Either you are circulating internal memos from a corporation that is not your property or you're circulating falsified information as part of a pump 'n dump.
As for the Clinton situation, all one need do is look at the number of personnel who have been prosecuted for the same offense. Aberdeen proving grounds, black general who was canned when his background came in hearing for Joint Chiefs of Staff, female pilot canned for affair. Nice double standard at work: one for white males, one for everyone else.
>This is where the problem herein lies. WHO said anything about
>perjury? Didn't come from the Republican camp, did it? Of course it
>did.
Perjury is an open issue with the question of materiality in the
Paula Jones case. If he purjures at the grand jury deposition, then
that is another case. His testimony will be tested against contrary
testimony and evidence.
The more important issue is tampering with witnesses and attempts to gather evidence to hide them from investigators. He used his aides, personal secretary, and others at government expense to cover up his mistakes.
>Clinton may have had an affair with Monica. If true, that is his
>private RIGHT to do so. Irrespective of right or wrong, it IS STILL
>AN ACT OF PRIVACY, and has absolutely NOTHING to do with PERJURY
>merely because he preferred that his sex life NOT become a public
>issue.
You people keep leaving out the very pertinent fact that he was
doing sex on the job and on job premises. The same situation that
led to the dismissal of the above personnel. One standard for the
commander-in-chief and another for the troops.
>He is part of running a COUNTRY. So what the hell does his sex life
>have to do with the price of eggs, people? Are any of you
>proposing a double standard here? If you have a NEED to know about
>HIS sex life, then we must level the playing field, and make it FAIR
>to all.
I don't care to know about his sex life. Why doesn't he keep it out
of a government office? I expect any employee doing it in the FBI
Building or State Department building to get booted. In fact, I know
of someone who did get booted from the State Dept. The same standard
should be held to bosses as to us workers.
>Why don't you hire another Linda Tripp character to videotape ALL of
>Bill's affairs, illicit or otherwise. Then we can deliver them to Mr.
>Witch Hunt himself, Ken "Starr" for evaluation for further testimony
>on whether or not Mr. Clinton perjured himself... What a bunch of
>crap!
Well, the fault lies with the person who tried to get Linda Tripp to
commit a federal crime. Many a criminal has been caught by wiretaps.
>I noticed that NONE of you addressed a single issue (other than the >right of privacy, in your twisted manner) that I have addressed in my
>"rant". The responses were those of people with "tunnel vision"
>thought processes... Never looking to the left or the right. Just
>your own brand of perception... Politics is inherently "crooked" by
>nature. Having said that, WHY have so many of you chosen to zero in
>on such incredibly insignificant subject matter?
What about the privacy of a corporation and its internal memos? Or
did you fake that information as I suspect. |
