SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Starnet (SNMM)Online gaming, sexsites, lottery, Sportsbook

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: M_Power who wrote (568)8/12/1998 7:04:00 PM
From: Drake  Read Replies (2) of 8858
 
M_Power.... Meph is a loser on CRYP. Look at this post of his here on July 20 on the CRYP thread. CRYP was around $12 to $14 and he says...

>>I think we've hit the bottom. Last time for these prices I think. If tomorrow looks good, I'll start to add more. I won't be surprise if the company starts buying back shares.

Mephistopheles.<<
Message 5254610

Well.... we all know what happened five days later. So it looks like Meph was piling up on CRYP and then to his dismay it crashed down to $5. He probably took his own advise so he comes around here, to the SNMM thread, trying to make himself feel good. It simply proved that Starnet's business model was better and withstood the Kyl Bill announcement where as CRYP crashed down to where he really should have been buying. Basically he would have lost 58%. Thats DOWN 58% on CRYP in 5 days. If I had made a call like that I would turn in my S.I. membership and take a crash CFA course......

The 144's that Meph posted only show they filed to trade those shares.....they are on the outside..the real insiders are still holding. No one can prove they did or didn't sell. It's paranoid thinking to think they sold because they more than likely DO know where the company is going in the next quarter and are looking forward to selling in the near future...at who knows $2 or $3..not the f**king day they filed......that's sheer paranoia based on circumstantial evidence.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext