AN Apology
No rather an addition to further clarify.
The following was part of my post to Antares responding to their famous or should I say their world famous letter to the web mistress, and there is a first part to this piece as follows:
Firstly, Bob Yeoman was asked if he was sure everyone at Antares was "squeaky" clean, his response was yes they are. Fair enough and I would accept that, but low and behold the caller asked the following questions as copied from my post..........
<Also Dennis you should really instruct Bob Yeoman not to hang up on callers when questioned about certain "promotors" of this Antares stock. Yes he actually did Dennis, when he said he did not know this particular person in question, he actually hung up when he was reminded a year ago that he said he had met this person on two occasions. I guess at that point Bob had enough, kinda like caught in the act. Dennis if you would like to add this point to the lawsuit this person is prepared to testify in a court of competent jurisdiction regarding this conversation. Dennis, Bob also told this person that Antares did not care about their stock price that this matter was more important, is that true?????? I can not believe that Antares does not care about their shareholders.>
It was only after asked about "squeaky" clean that the questions concerning "promoters" came up, then the phone got slammed down.....
Oh how the spider weaves the web and catches its prey...........
Bob do you remember the conversation,,,,,,,,,,, darn I have hung up on people too,,,,,,,, but they were not shareholders in a public company ,,,,, asking............. apparently sensitive questions.
The Energizer Bunny TAP ..... TAP ....... TAP....... |
