International Precious Metals (IPMCF) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF)

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Paunch who wrote (33670)	8/12/1998 11:05:00 PM
From: Tim Hall	Read Replies (1) of 35569

Paunch, There was some early work done by BD, 96, I think. IPM said it was chain of custody. The actual report says that BD observed IPM chain of custody one day and found it to be ok. After that IPM BoD, at a share holders meeting passed new by laws where by they did not have to disclose consultant contracts or reports, even to share holders. I am willing to bet you all of my shares of LMMI against all of your shares of IPM that if you could read all of the contracts and reports, BD is Scott Free. LMMI is doing terrible, not as bad as IPM. What is Sam Shaw doing now days? While you are at it, find out what happened to all of the IPM shares that Omega=Phoenix= Maxam=Runyon held. I suspect that they were all sold prior to last November. IMHO Tim

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next