I believe that if you research the convoluted and untraceable aspects of dear "krishna" the encylopedia might explain that he/it actually has SEVERAL manifestations, under DIFFERENT names, and one of these is as the enelphant trunked blue skinned whore-dog as it is called in the venacular. Gopi girls, herding sheep, apparently santifies the actions of what would be a sexual predator were it not a blue skinned, elephant tusked god.
What the Lord, the real one, is definitely instructing me in this matter is that I have been relieved of the obligation to discuss Krishna, or indian religions exported from the darkest early hours of history from the Indus valley. I have glanced over the Book of the Dead, and realize it is a book for the dead. I feel that I should not only let the dead bury the dead but discuss the dead. This is one's right under the Constitution, and I support that right.
But I believe if you would care to actually discuss the various aspects of Krishna here, there are those that strongly enjoy those discussions, and are usually those who despise Jesus Christ, but cling happily to the blue-skinned, elephant trunked sex addict.
:)
§¨§ Isn't she judging the Indian religions too harshly?
§¨§ That depends on who is listening, of course.
Anyway, again, I was very surprised to suddenly be drawn back here, and especially to discussions of Krishna and Kali, and in no way want to appear rude to not want to discuss them in depth, but it is completely out of my universe's perimeters. Rich is the good bud of Atman. |
