Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Jim McMannis who wrote (36000)	8/14/1998 7:18:00 PM
From: Yougang Xiao	Read Replies (1) of 1574254

AMD/Intel and Y2K Issues: A while back, some including CEO of CPQ suggested that existing PC owners (both consumers and corporations) would opt to purchase new computers to replace older PC to overcome Y2K problems. If true, PC demands could pick up considerately later on, and that is good for AMD and Intel alike. To quantify, facts to the following questions would help greatly: 1. What is the worldwide installed/in-use PC base (numbers)? We know that Windows 95/98 require a entry level Pentium to run and Windows 95/98 are Y2K compliant (from my own unscientific testing), hence, further question: 2. What is the rough total output of Pentium, Pentium x so far (educated guess here, we all know that Intel does not reveal its CPU units number). Those who uses Windows 95/98 with Pentium (and up) class machines are less likely to purchase new PC based on Y2K concern alone. Therefore, the Y2K upgrade hope rests on those still use 486 and OS below Windows 95. 3. Are DOS and Windows 3x Y2K compliant? If not, then 4. Whether the Y2K solution can rectify Y2K problem that machines running DOS/Windows 3x are facing?

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next