Look at yourself, you thought Mike Skillern was indited because they said so.
And you seem to expect people to believe Graystone is a "paid basher" simply because YOU said so. You have, of course, been asked to adduce some proof. But you never will, because there isn't any.
Now. I, at any rate, have never specifically said that Mike Skillern was indicted (note correct spelling, please). I said that he testified against his father, and admitted his own complicity in the fraud scheme. This--which is provable fact, sourced in my own earlier posts--suggests two possibilities: 1) he dislikes Bud so much that he cheerfully took this opportunity to get him convicted of a crime; 2) he plea-bargained to get himself off the hook.
Whatever may have been the case, he did--I feel that when communicating with you I must frequently repeat myself--admit to having played an active role in the scam. And I really don't think people like that make for the kind of CEOs I care to put my trust in.
By the way, does anyone know what Mike was doing between 1991, year of the trial, and 1995, the year in which CYGS was founded? Man Without a Past. Might be interesting to find this out... |
