SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Turbodyne Technologies Inc. (TRBDF)

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Mad2 who wrote (1761)8/16/1998 2:47:00 AM
From: BigCapGuy  Read Replies (1) of 3458
 
I failed to notice a few things on the first read. Foremost I guess is that some or all of the devices are being given free of charge.

Anyway it's up to Turbodyne to get in there and identify/create revenue opportunities. Only thing I can think of is that if the technology can do something no one else can I bet NJ would at least look at it. I think a big differentiator here is the improved fuel efficiency. The Turbopac pays for itself, it's not just a clean up device like a catalytic converter. I'll be really pissed if Turbodyne isn't aware of this opportunity at least. We already know the EPA, DDC, and sh*t even the UN is on board w/ Turbodyne. Must make for a bang up sales pitch!

I also missed that NJ will be issuing fines for trucks, was it,
that don't meet some standard. It's about time government is getting involved here. I find it insulting to see trucks and buses spewing out all that smoke when there are ways to prevent it. I'll be really happy when I see cops pulling these trucks over and testing them right on the spot. My gut feeling is that they'd be the biggest fools in history if they can't capitalize on this product. I think I'll give my friends in Jersey a call and have them call this Contact: Jeff Lamm, (609) 292-5203 NJDOT I guess. I'm sure they'd be interested in finding out if NJDOT is looking at Turbopacs and if not then why not.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext