SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Nokia (NOK)
NOK 6.730-0.7%Nov 14 9:30 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: marginmike who wrote (875)8/16/1998 10:45:00 AM
From: Dave  Read Replies (2) of 34857
 
Mike:

"first off no no voice recognition."

I wasn't trying to make fun of either your spelling or grammar. What I saw was that you spelled "are" as "our" and I have seen many speech recognition software packages have difficulty differentiating the two and I was curious which one you had and how much training you did.

Now, about the patent thing. 450 patents are, indeed, a bunch of patents. However, both Motorolla, Nokia and Ericy have CDMA patents. QCOM is stating that their patent portfolio for IS-95 covers CDMA2000 since they never mention bitrate. Basically, QCOM is stating that their initial IS-95 patents give them broad coverage for CDMA2000.

However, have you ever seen a patent? Patents cover implementation. It is also well known in the patent community that some people have "paper" patents. That means, it was never physically implemented. In order to get a patent, the inventor must show a novel feature. It doesn't matter how big, or how small it is. Therefore, all ericy, mot, or even Nokia has to do is modify QCOM's patents in a small novel way.

"If you look at the experience MOTanic had, as well as early NOKIA dificulty it is clear this is a very complex Technology"

I think any engineer will give you that MOT had extreme difficulty.... <g> However, Nokia has appeared to execute flawlessly in handset/infrastructure development.

"Finally even if patents are circumvented Q will drag all to court. This is a major block for vendors who will hessitate on spending Billions to build out when there is any chance they can be draged into court."

Well, after a patent has issued, which means that the application has been deemed novel and becomes a patent, the next stage to contest is court. Both QCOM and ERICY know courtrooms very well and, in my opinion, enjoy suing each other.

I just thought of something, how do we know QCOM is willing to license their patent portfolio of CDMA2000 patents to ERICY and Nokia? I bet they are unwilling to license if ERICY doesn't give IS-95 customers an upgrade path.....Mike, what do you think of that? That was an idea tha I am "shooting from the hip"

"For godsakes the stock is selling at almost 1 times sales!"

There is a well respected man on the Intel thread named Paul Engel who also supports QCOM b/c of their innovative technology. However, Qualcomm is taking on 800 lb gorillas of the likes of ERICY and Nokia.. Given the market share of GSM/TDMA and the upgrade path ERICY and Nokia are given to their customers, it appears that the game is already lost.

dave
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext