MTEI - Mountain Energy - No BASHING Allowed Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : MTEI - Mountain Energy - No BASHING Allowed

MTEI 0.00360

0.0%

Jan 16 9:30 AM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: LionHeart who wrote (8959)	8/16/1998 2:08:00 PM
From: Janice Shell	Read Replies (3) of 11684

Plenty of people? Go find 5 separate post from 5 separate people who ask me this. The ones I have seen I PM them "YES", and the ones you find and will answer. Until SI makes a full thread search possible I'm not gonna bother. I do know, however, that I asked about PP at least three times. There was in fact a lengthy discussion about whether they might or might not be paid for their services to MTEI. I received no PMs from you. Little Engine also asked, much more recently. Did he get a PM? LE, you out there? Value Plus has NO connection to MTEI other then featuring their stock. Penny Picks felt as though they where lied to over a period of time, and only after this time the stock goes over to Stock Justice. Huh? The Pennypicks domain was set up on 6 June. The Stockjustice site was set up on 11 June. Did "Pennypicks", which is to say Lionheart, EXPECT to be lied to? And what else, exactly, does Value Plus do? Other than create websites whose sole purpose appears to be to "feature" MTEI? I notice that you work for a company called "Power Plus". Any connection? Now when and only when the current and previous stockholders of MTEI are banning [sic: you mean "banding" and really should change that at the SJ site] together you seem to be challenging Stock Justice's intentions as if it is not on the better part of the shareholders. Well. You characterize this as a "question" though it really isn't. What concerns me? I've already said I find it strange that you didn't see fit to reveal your connection to either site publicly. But here's the really IMPORTANT thing: Stockjustice asks shareholders to divulge quite a lot of personal information in order to qualify for whatever it is they're supposedly qualifying for. Sure there's a promise that this info will remain confidential. But NOWHERE at this site is it revealed to WHOM this information is being sent. Presumably to Lionheart. Who is Lionheart, and what are his qualifications for organizing a class action? Do I think there's something wrong with this? Yes.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next