SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Golden Eagle Int. (MYNG)
MYNG 0.0700+5.7%Feb 21 4:00 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: CIMA who wrote (12339)8/18/1998 2:49:00 PM
From: the Chief  Read Replies (2) of 34075
 
Hi CIMA. You said:Feel free to tear my logic apart...

Let's assume 200,000,000 ozs of gold. Let's assume 10,000,000 proven.

Where did you ever get 200mm ozs from ...even on an assumption...which at best is absolutely proposterous!! Even Guido doesn't assume 200,000,000 ounces!!

Secondly, there is ONE report that states that smaller particles of gold raise the values from .8g/t to 14 g/cu/m.

So if ONE was going to assume anything at this point, he would assume that Trites and crew (prior Guido) were right and Guido's was the "throw away high"!

I know you, from other threads, I didn't think you'd come out with something as irresponsible as this! What you have "assumed" is a deposit 3 times bigger than any other deposit in the "world", in the WHOLE FREAKIN WORLD!!! From ONE GEOLOGIST WHO HAS FOUND something no other geologist has discovered elsewhere in the whole of Bolivia!! And you are going to ASSUME 200,000,000 ozs?????????

Geez

the Chief
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext