The poster on AOL who predicted it, he called a fool.
Here is a sample of the AOL poster pallisard endorses:
Poster: "The stock closed at 22 1/16. If it breaks 21, it might
slump back to the 15-16 area. What do you think?"
Response: You asked what I think.
1. You are disappointed that VLNC pulled back further today and is down about 50%.
2. You wish VLNC were earning $2.00/share and worth $22.
3. You will never learn, condemned to your pettiness for life.
Poster: "Canstic -
Are you Visnic in disguise?? Why are you screaming out these over-
optimistic opinions while completely overlooking the technical analysis.
The "dead cat bounce" is nearly complete. Technically speaking you
can expect a return to the 21 area to form a double bottom before any
major turnaround begins. IMO"
Poster: "Mail room clerks are not good investment counselors.
If you want to make some money, sell MIKL and buy VLNC now!"
Response: Go back and read my posts on MIKL (and VLNC for that matter). The case for MIKL is fundamental based. When you made the ridiculous statement that MIKL was preordained to fall, my response was that given the fundamentals, if it fell to the low 20's it would be all the more compelling and I would buy more. Based on fundamentals, I said MIKL would be fairly valued in low to mid-40's. I also said that the low to mid-40's
would be a fair 12 month target. And it is.
Keep putting money into the market ronroy, the market is a zero sum game and without lightweights to throw their money away, it is more difficult to exploit inefficiencies.
Regarding VLNC, which has fallen from 10 to less than 5 and remains under 5 today, I raised questions regarding its poor balance sheet, frequent change in senior management, and poor credibility in meeting targets. The market appears to be pricing VLNC pretty efficiently at under 5. You are an angry person. If VLNC is representative of your investment prowess, it is clear why you are so angry and dense.
A fool? That word is pallisard's not mine. The description that comes to mind regarding the poster is a different one. |
