Hi everyone:
Fred, thank for your compliment. But I must say that everyone who participates is an asset to the thread. Without participation, there is no thread. I also enjoyed many great posts from the like of ztect, terri acey, Lane Hall-Witt, Malko, Dr. Epstein, planter, Bill on the Hill and many others. I also enjoyed the researches and articles dug up by Allen who never seemed to sleep. Although there are nasty naysayers and skeptical potential investors who question the validity of PNL concept, it is from the productive and constructive interactions of these skeptical that more truths and knowledge are discovered. Nasty naysayers, being human and all, are very much part of our society. While not appealing to look at, they are the fuels of our society. Because of the naysayers, visionaries go out to prove them wrong. And society moves cautiously ahead.
But too much of one thing is also detriment to health. Thus a balance approach is the natural norm. This is central theme of ying/yang theory as expressed by the Tao philosophy originated in ancient China. For every positive force, there is an equal balance of negative force and vice versa. And when one force gets too much attention, an equilibrium must be restored before damage is done. This equilibrium applies to every facet of our life- from our human body to cosmic universe. Yes, even our thought process.
If not because of the naysayers, I would still be a lurker now. Thus, the child plays in the thread didn't bother me. It was just simply the thread way of finding its equilibrium. Although some may disagree with others' style of contribution, they are just the way they are. And they should be accepted as the way they are. Pag's style, believe it or not, IMHO also plays a major role in contributing to the equilibrium of this thread. And when John Mock agrees with Pag for once, I know the equilibrium is founded. I don't believe that potential investors will be scared away by the thread's activities in finding its equilibrium. If they are, then they shouldn't be investing in OTC-BB to begin with. Serious investors know these child plays (naysayers battle against so-called cheerleaders) are part of the thread natural life form. Don't get me wrong, for there are times I find these child plays annoying as hell sometimes. But like naysayers, these child plays are very much part of what being human is all about.
As for prediction of PNL price for tomorrow, I will like to go one step further. Instead of price, I will also give my two cents worth to predict the impact of PNL in the near future. Before that, I would have to concur with Warren and Pag on their post #1212 and #1213 respectively. My prediction is that PNLK will break all barriers and become the first BB to shake the Nasdaq market. Why? Because their revenue source are not based on perceived potential advertising revenues but based on hard number like subscription revenues. Unlike Yahoo whose regular users just simply log on to surf, PNLK users actually subscribe and pay to log on to surf. While Yahoo can claims million of regular users; it can only go to reflect potential advertising revenue. However, IF and WHEN PNL claims xxx number of regular users, we all know it will mean one thing- REAL SUBSCRIPTION REVENUES.
I believe that Glenn mentioned that Phase 2 incorporates a webpage within a webpage feature. I don't know about you guys, but this sound like heavy stuff to me. PNL website will have doors to different partnership services! For each new strategic partnership that signs up with ProNetLink, there will be new door open up in the PNL website! This sounds like a GREAT IDEA to me. Do you see the potential here? Will ProNetLink become the business portal of the future??? I can only see that the sky is the limit once they pass the first test of Phase II as noted by ztect. This is why I think PNL will break all barriers to become the first BB to shake the Nasdaq market. And this is also why I think this is one start-up I like to invest for long-term.
Again, this is all in my humble opinion only.
Prosperity to ALL!
|
