Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM)

QCOM 170.90

-1.3%

Nov 7 3:59 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Renby Cage who wrote (13926)	8/19/1998 8:29:00 AM
From: tero kuittinen	Read Replies (3) of 152472

Hmmm... that was fascinating in some warped kind of way... some of the verisimilitude was lost when you consistently misspelled her name... that's I, not E, if it's a Finnish name. The problem with Qualcomm's technology, of course, it's the way it fails to live up to the world class hype. Wall Street Journal: GSM has better voice quality than CDMA. Businessweek: Nokia's 6100 series is the hottest phone in USA. Forbes: Qualcomm is not competitive in wideband-CDMA and IS-95 has benefited from a nationalistic bias. It's not like even American commentators were bowled over by Qcom's technology. I find it strange that CDMA phones are trailing GSM phones so badly in key specs like weight, stand-by time, voice quality, design, etc... yet Qualcomm is still placidly continuing its hypefest about "technological superiority". Couldn't they visit some retail outlet for a reality check? The customers will. Tero

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next