SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : SI Grammar and Spelling Lab

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Dayuhan who wrote (1396)8/19/1998 12:29:00 PM
From: Jacques Chitte   of 4711
 
To me, the word utilize has a special niche of meaning. "put into use" is very close. For me, the criterion is a sense of degree. To what extent is a given resource utilized? That kinda thing. Never mind what the resource is used for. "Semiconductor foundry capacity is being less than 50% utilized." Used strikes me as a hint less informative here. But yes, 98% of the time the verb is - uhm, used - merely to score a coupla cheap syllables.

As for the penny&spark plug question - "destroy" doesn't sing. "Utilize" taps into the rich vein of military English, which fields an impressive collection of esoteric euphemisms for kick the **** out of. Somebody once sent me a wonderful list of Pentagon euphemese; pity I can't find it. I might have to deploy a reconnaissance in force into the disputed territories of my hard drive.

My Completely Misappropriated Word du jour is "impact" used as a verb. Aside from the specialist medical term (colon, molar) and as a noun (meteoric impact) I feel with some passion that the word "affect" is a 100% drop-in replacement. For the noun (excluding specialist usage, and this most emphatically excludes HR personnel) "effect" is good.

Don't get me started on "gender". :-)
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext