The only people that can lose at ths point is current shareholders, and they have said they understand the risks.
Not that they have to justify it to anybody.
Allen, are you telling me that all the shareholders support what Riley and Pugs did on this thread; ie hyping a stock they may/may not have known was a complete scam?
I can tell you seven that didn't!
I, for one, enjoy listening to the counterpoints of Joe Master and tonto, and I have more right being here than you do.
My first post on this thread was followed up with a harassment by a yeasayer. That should've been a warning flag right there for me. I even said things to support the company, and was still harassed.
You don't get it, Allen. You're not exactly dealing with the cream of the crop in terms of decency. S Martin and tonto have tried to show decency and factual evidence until they were personally attacked(look back in the posts, I don't need to repeat myself. If you don't believe me, they're all there).
Stuff like "Prodigal Son" makes me love coming back here. Only when I'm completely ignored do I start to come back with less frequency. When DJ Byrne comes up with rare rapier wit like last night, it prompts a response. And most of the naysayers are here to say, "I told you so" to those who have poked at them.
And I, for one, don't blame them. It's human nature, and although none of the nays may admit it, I'm sure many feel the same way.
I'm sure that a comment you could hear throughout the naysaying camp after the halt: "It couldn't have happened to a nicer bunch of people."
Sad thing is, for every jerk shareholder in RMIL, there's a nice guy trying to make a living.
But the loud ones always seem to matter more. |
