Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Joseph Ziebarth who wrote (70)	8/19/1998 3:09:00 PM
From: j_b	Read Replies (1) of 67261

<< Starr was unable to find chargable offences in Arkansas or in the Washington DC travel agency >> Even the federal judge that was involved in hearing the case that Clinton's people brought against the head of the Travel Office said that it was an inexcusable abuse of power. We don't know what evidence Starr has against the first couple - it may include just such things as you say don't exist. Starr would have to have the most unassailable case possible precisely due to the rabid defense he gets from his supporters (I mean rabid as in tough, determined, etc., not in any bad sense). One thing to keep in mind - a crime need not have been committed to result in an impeachmnet. Impeachment is a political issue, not a legal one, and Starr's investigation is aimed both at indictments and at potential articles of impeachment.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next