Dusty,
It's not about poetry and you know it. It is about assumption.
My reference was to the fact that again, you jumped the gun and made an assumption, that turned out to be wrong.
You yourself have said that is not a prudent thing to do, and I was simply pointing out where you, again, have contradicted yourself.
You have said many things lately that do pertain to this stock that are also of an assumptive nature. Is it possible that you could be wrong there as well?
You are the one who made the call to Dan Fisher, and two months later still refuse to honor your agreement to fill us all in. That, along with the innuendos, and your refusal to post anything about Fisher that could be viewed by others as negative, leaves the reader with nothing to do but speculate and assume, which you yourself say you are against! Why do you refuse to acknowledge than Dan Fisher did wrong here?
Not Flaming, but I just don't understand. Are you really the new self appointed crusader, or are you just some pissed off old lady who lost money on a stock because you didn't do your homework?
Please help to enlighten me, as this is so confusing it is nauseating. (or at least I think it's the confusion that nauseates me...)
Anna |
