You and DavidCG, re: Cryogenics
or
What do you think that means ?
Does it have anything to do with the company at all then ?
It was a failed effort because the company could never do what they claimed.
It has nothing to do with anyone's stance on abortion, it has everything to do with claims made about technology.
It was never politics, it could never be done.
Do you guys want to consider that fact, it could never be done. Then go back and look at what was claimed, this company is dumber than a bag of hammers, or they lack scientific integrity, you don't have any other explanations do you ?
Either explanation means that this is not a good investment, is it ?
If they are dumber than a bag of hammers, then who would trust what they claim today, it could simply be a misunderstanding about what can and cannot be done, like the Frozen Babies. If they knew they couldn't freeze, then re-animate fetuses, then they were not telling the truth, even while they paid the first printing bills.
The past performance of company management is always germane, it has an affect on everyone's investment decision. Good financial records are also important, what does E. always say ;
Follow the money
One of the Company founders, Mike Skillern, was involved with a major scam, his father actually went to prison for his role in that affair. How much money did they steal, was any of it recovered ? |
