SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Identix (IDNX)
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: jean who wrote (10008)8/20/1998 4:52:00 PM
From: Jorj X Mckie  Read Replies (1) of 26039
 
Jean and JSaf,
Two parts to this post, first part real IDX content, second part IDX content free.

P&F read of IDX
IDX chart doesn't give any indication that it is moving up right now. The good news is that it appears to have good support at $5.50. If IDX reverses up to $7.50 it would be a good sign since it would be a higher low. A good indication that IDX will move significantly is if it can break through the bearish resistance line. This would take a move to $9.00. This is a key resistance point. Relative strength is negative, which makes long entries into this stock risky.

Now the content free portion:
You both have apparently taken great offense that your group was visited by post-grubbers. Just out of curiousity, was it because you had to click on your mouse button a few extra times or was it because you wanted the 10000 post yourselves:

David in DC writes,
To all. . . . we've just seen post 10000 grabbed by a couple of incoherent adolescents. Sort of like having a visit by Visigoths.

J. Saf
P.S. After we have the two idiots kicked off Silicon Investor and their posts removed this may actually be Post #10,000!

Jean and J. Saf, are you willing to voluntarily take whatever punishment that is dished out to my fellow post-grubber and I, if we can find an equal number of IDX content free posts in this thread authored by you?

I'll point out that your posts concerning our perceived intrusion had absolutely no IDX content in them that could not have been handled in private messages. Especially the name calling.

Tom
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News