Thank-you muchly! But if I were Racom, I'd be looking for a way to get the message out. It is this kind of thing that is hurting the company. In fact, it does a disfavor. I'm glad you brought this to my attention. It merits discussion and you now have my opinion on the matter. For all those outside the loop, I ask, "didn't you learn more because my PM was turned off?"
I hope, just because someone shared some information, you don't start thinking you are an insider. You'll be disappointed. Then again, you know you need a rest when that happens; i.e., thinking you're an insider.
Besides, I have established my position in RCOM and there isn't much they can say to make me buy more. Unlike, 0|0, I won't be averaging down. I've been sucked into too many small caps to make that mistake again. BTW, did you catch RMTR's new low today ( 1 7/8)? What are they going to do when the conversion hits? Makes selling at 2 5/8 look kind.
Another thing, Racom can talk about how FRAM stacks up against the competition until the cows come home but what I'm waiting for is a kick-ass alliance with Verifone or Schlumberger or some other sugar daddy. That VP may not know it but I'm sure Hinds does... Racom's major constraint is that it faces stiff competition with little money, not technology. Their salvation rests with Hinds ability to create such an alliance. This is where we separate the men from the boys, Hinds from Sikes, that sort of thing. It also explains why Racom's VP is still VP.
BTW, Don't tell me that was you I saw buying today! |
