Clinton's Scandals: Is this corruption the worst ever? Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Clinton's Scandals: Is this corruption the worst ever?

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Bill Grant who wrote (2360)	8/20/1998 10:44:00 PM
From: Rick Slemmer	Read Replies (1) of 13994

Bill: I believe the current limit is around $600,000. This may still be true, but I'm sure I heard a news report one day in 93 or 94 that said Clinton wanted to lower the limit to $60,000. I recall being particularly incensed that any net worth above that amount was to be taxed, including the market value of any house as part of the decedent's estate. This was around the same time that "the rich" were redefined as making $30,000 a year. Anyone else remember that? RS

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next