Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: art slott who wrote (280)	8/21/1998 11:10:00 AM
From: j_b	Read Replies (2) of 67261

<< Since he has not been found guilty you can't say that he lied under oath>> I'm not sure I agree with you here. Ignoring the flip comments (I can say anything I like - just try and stop me!!! <vbg>), courts exist to decide legalities, not truth. We all have at least some idea of what was said under oath and Clinton's comments since then, and it seems fairly obvious that he lied - remember when he said that he couldn't remember being alone with Monica, and that even if they were, noting remarkable happened? These are obvious lies, even if we ignore the technical definition of sex used in the case. Is he guilty of perjury or any other illegality? Not yet. Even if he did the deed, Clinton is not technically guilty until convicted, something that may never happen either because no crime was comitted or because it would not be politically correct to kick him when he's down.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next