Clinton's Scandals: Is this corruption the worst ever? Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Clinton's Scandals: Is this corruption the worst ever?

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Doughboy who wrote (2391)	8/21/1998 11:59:00 AM
From: j_b	Read Replies (1) of 13994

<< Do you really believe that the "food chain" method of federal prosecutions should be used on the President of the United States>> This is a very interesting question. Should the President be treated in a different manner by the law than are "regular" citizens. Another question for you - when you describe the investigation as a fishing expedition, you assume that the prosecutor doesn't know what he's looking for. Yet you don't make that distinction in the organized crime cases. If it really was a fishing expedition, I agree with you. If, however, Starr "knew" the President was dirty (ate Christian babies, actually liked Tofu, etc.), would Starr be justified in fishing for whatever it took to take the man down. Please note that I am not saying Clinton is (or is not) guilty of anything - I only want to know if there would ever be justification for going after a President for little stuff.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next