Intel Corporation (INTC) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC)

INTC 40.56

+10.2%

Nov 28 9:30 AM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: TTOSBT who wrote (62984)	8/21/1998 1:46:00 PM
From: Gerald Walls	Read Replies (1) of 186894

Look first of all I am not nor will I ever be a lawyer and I am not defending Clinton. I am trying to figure out what the justification was for our appointed officials to spend 40million tax payer's dollars when IMHO they could of probably found many a cures for much needed diseases had they spend that same monies time and effort to find something out that we already knew! If it was to vindicate Packwood then you should remember his complaints came from those women he had sex with while Monica Lawinsky's arms and hair was pulled to get her to even go into the court room not to mention what her mother was put through! Not the same Packwood was much different. You're right. Packwood didn't lie under oath about it. That's about the only difference though. The Lewinsky matter surfaced due to the Paula Jones sexual-misconduct law suit. (Of course, Paula Jones is just a liar like all those other women Clinton has denied having anything to do with, I guess.) Packwood and Clinton both resisted turning over incriminating documents. Both used their office to try to hide from prosecution. The money was spent due to a law passed by a Democrat-controlled Congress to make sure we didn't have to have another Nixon. Don't forget that real felonies were uncovered by that investigation, people went to prison and a Governor was convicted and resigned, only nothing could be conclusively pinned on Clinton. And you have a Clinton supporter charged with criminal contempt because she refused to testify under subpoena since Sept 1996. As far as the money spent finding out what we already knew, the First Liar is at fault there for lying under oath, lying to the entire nation and then stonewalling for seven months. Clinton's supporters have also ran up millions in legal bills fighting Starr. I suggest they ask the President for reimbursement since he was lying to them too.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next