>>You know what's interesting, Ed? When Bob Packwood had his sexual troubles, the mainstream media and all the bitchy whiny feminists were *very* condemning and damning of sexual harassment.
REMINDER#2: Clinton has NEVER been found guilty of sexual harrassment against anyone. If you will recall, Jones LOST her sexual harassment case against the president. And, Monica Lewinsky has not accused the President of sexual harrassment. And, there is no sexual harassment case pending against clinton as we speak.
Thank you, however, for revealing your true stand on women's issues. By doing so you have made your motives in this matter obvious to all. Your interest in Jones, Lewinsky et. al. has NOTHING to do with what happened or may have happened to them and EVERYTHING with your selfish interests in your own political agenda - thus proving my point that this is a political witch hunt and nothing more.
W/o sex there is no Paula Jones case.
W/o sex there is no Linda Tripp.
W/o sex there is no Monica Lewinsky.
W/o sex there is no Kenneth Starr wiring Linda Tripp to record Monica Lewinsky to lay a perjury trap for President WJC.
W/o sex there is no perjury trap and thus, no obstruction of justice nor any suborning of perjury.
W/o sex Kenneth Starr had no case!!!
Amazing how lily white our president is given that an attorney of Starr's stature, with unlimited scope and resources, and after 4 years, his entire case against the President rests on a sexual pecadillo. Shame on him and shame on the Clinton haters for putting their self interests above the country's interests. My advice to them is to apply their limitless energies to productive uses, perhaps having some great sex themselves would be a good start. Then again, maybe there aren't enough compliant "non-bitchy non-whiny non-feminists" to go around. What a shame.
And the rest-of-the-world- watches and wonders, have the Americans gone mad?! |
