SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical : SNRS- Sunrise Technologies
SNRS 0.0000010000.0%Jun 6 11:01 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: HeyRainier who wrote (1543)8/24/1998 6:31:00 PM
From: emil  Read Replies (3) of 4140
 
OT- worth a chuckle at least. It seems the Motley Fools dont care for TA:

The relevant part to the world of investing, however, comes in with the rat who was rewarded with the food pellet randomly. This rat
just kept pressing and pressing and pressing. Because it never learned any set schedule for reward, it took the longest to figure out that no
more food was coming. Consequently, the rat who was intermittently rewarded developed the learned response that took the most time to
extinguish.

What does this have to do with investing? Its pretty straightforward. Behaviors that are intermittently rewarded are the most persistent --
thus the success of the myopic science of technical analysis. Completely ignorant of the actual business dynamics represented by the
company behind the ticker, the technical analyst relies on charts of past price movement, which he swears foretell future stock
appreciation. It's much like driving a car by looking in the rearview mirror. Nonetheless, occasionally, the technical analyst is right.

The problem is that they are right on an intermittent basis. Which means they develop a learned response that becomes darn near
impossible to extinguish. All kinds of justifications, ranging from the sublime to the ridiculous, are given for why past price performance
determines future stock appreciation -- in spite of the fact that Malkiel's tremendous book A Random Walk Down Wall Street clearly
proved that no chart pattern had any predictive value above and beyond what was possible through pure chance. Even technical analysts
will admit that their "science" is really more art than system, saying that experience informs the reading of charts.

Others might say that what is really going on is that they are still getting those pellets on an intermittent basis.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext