SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : DOCS - A TURNAROUND PLAY
DOCS 51.44+0.9%Nov 28 9:30 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Michael Pascoe who wrote (633)8/24/1998 11:39:00 PM
From: Michael Watkins  Read Replies (1) of 1156
 
Still, I don't at this time see WebDAV removing the need for Document Management Systems. If a word processor, or web page editor, or development tool were able to access, edit, and create files on a remote repository, sure, that is good functionality.

NT or NetWare or a web server would be examples of a remote repository.

But in many cases I still see a requirement for metadata management, and I don't see hierarchical file systems (such as the examples provided above) providing that. So, DM systems will also be remote repositories when requirements demand the services of a DMS.

Check out -
ics.uci.edu
and the W3C itself -
w3.org

There's another issue as well with client access standards. Its important that a large majority of client applications support such standards, and early on, there's never enough support broadly across all apps. We are still waiting to see ODMA supported really broadly.

Unless I'm missing something I'd say WebDAV will end up being complimentary to the efforts of DM vendors.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext