SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC)
INTC 48.72+3.0%Jan 14 3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Jim McMannis who wrote (63330)8/25/1998 11:54:00 AM
From: Tony Viola  Read Replies (2) of 186894
 
Jim, The Celeron A is the
equal and slighter faster than the Pentium II when overclocked to over 400Mhz."

Why are you comparing Pentium II's at "normal" speeds with Celerons that are (way) overclocked, both re processor clock and system bus? Pentium II's could be overclocked too, you know, in which case they are faster again than Celeron. BTW, overclocking is nothing but an invitation to ELF (early life failure) at worst, or unreliable operation at best. That is, unless you get one that is "underbinned" just for the sake of keeping enough quantity of all clock speeds available.

It seems like your posts have gone off the deep end recently, resembling those of an alarmist, going from one extreme to the other about Intel vs. AMD vs. themselves. Trying to stir the pot by creating a lot of FUD is what it looks like to me.

Tony
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext