Action Performance....ACTN Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Action Performance....ACTN

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Tokyo VD who wrote (83)	8/25/1998 12:00:00 PM
From: feltburner	Read Replies (1) of 278

Scott and Tokyo, just thought I'd jump into your "argument" here. The correct comparison is .50 vs. .30; the reason your math doesn't get to .50 is that the fully diluted number of shares can include convertible debt, warrants and options. While the share count would increase from conversion or exercise of these instruments, the company would receive cash and/or eliminate interest payments in return, thus improving the net interest figure and thus the net income figure to used in the numerator. I am extremely interested in the reason for the huge short interest however, as shorts are frequently correct when they show that much conviction. -Felt Burner P.S.- Scott, did you (or do you still) follow Osicom?

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next