Rickets
or
Other Deficiencies
Many posters on this thread are not helping us get to the bottom of the AZNT story. You are one of them.
I have done a swack of excellent D&D here, but I still cannot find where the "rickets treated by oranges" story originated.
I know you are just repeating it, I and everyone else are just ignorant, and I should do my own D&D, but I begin to suspect that you may actually be wrong.
100% totally irresponsibly wrong.
This is stupider than B52's dropping bombs from 60,000ft. They can't fly that high and never bomb from the combat ceiling.
You are the ignorant one here, no doubt about it.
Rickets are not treated by oranges, I don't care what your script says, rickets are treated by sunlight.
If you ever got out of the cave, that would be obvious to you.
Boy wonder contends B52's drop bombs from 60,000ft, you contend rickets are treated with oranges.
AZNT : SI's Stupidest Thread
Why not give up your D&D charade and admit you know nothing about rickets, bombers, Indians, or oranges. I suspect you actually know nothing about anything or anyone, like anyone. Let me ask my question again, who confirms the historical usage of plants found in the Amazon Basin and Highlands. The historical usage is what allows these plants to be sold as dietary supplements. Claims made by those providing historical usage proof to the FDA do not require any testing or verification. You don't suppose they Ask The Indian and then package it and sell it do you ? It really does appear to be the way it works, doesn't it ?
"Hey Indian"
"Yuh"
"Will this kill you."
"Nope"
"Will it make my hair grow"
"Yuh"
A dietary supplement which contains a new dietary ingredient (i.e.,
not on the market before October 15, 1994) will require evidence of a historical use or other evidence of safety establishing that it is reasonably expected to be safe. Manufacturers of dietary supplements which make a "statement of nutritional support" must have substantiation that the statement is truthful and not misleading. |
